Today I’m going to share with you a powerful method to boost your SAT Essay score. This method helps many students figure out exactly what point of view to take on the essay and helps them to avoid accidentally writing examples that are off topic. When you are done reading please leave a comment below.
The SAT Essay Prompt Dissection Technique
The prompt dissection technique is a way to break down the SAT Essay prompt into basic elements. This makes it extremely easy to write an organized, on-topic essay that will impress graders every time.
Follow these steps:
1. Skip the quote and read the SAT Essay question first which is just underneath the quote (you can read the quote next or just skip it all together).
2. Circle the most important words in the prompt.
3. Discover what the yes/no question you are being asked to respond to is.
4. Generate examples that would work for BOTH sides of the thesis.
Tip number four may sound like the opposite of what you should do but it actually makes the SAT Essay much easier to write than trying to only generate examples for one side of the argument.
5. Choose the thesis that’s easiest to support INSTEAD of a thesis that you agree with. This way you will always be able to write a complete well-supported essay.
Warning: Students that neglect tip five above accidentally end up writing an essay on a thesis that’s impossible for them to prove. This has caused some students to get very low scores. So take this advice seriously if you want to get a perfect score on the SAT Essay.
You may still lose some valuable points on the SAT Essay, if you don’t learn a few more tips.
To find out how to get a high SAT Essay score, take my SAT Essay course.
The course is powerful – and inside I have many more secrets that will teach you how to beat the SAT Essay in just minutes a day!
Click here to take the course and get a perfect SAT Essay score! -> SAT Essay Success.


Leave A Reply (1 comment So Far)
SoDoMe
361 days ago
What is the best approach to make examples that are universal for all topics?
[Reply]